264. Family Secrets

Families have the right to have some secrets. All kinds of things that happen in families are private. They may have projects and plans they don’t want people to know about. They may have problems they’re trying to solve, and they want to involve only people they think will help. People want privacy for all kinds of good reasons, and as long as they aren’t doing anything terribly wrong, they ought to be allowed to have that privacy.
Children don’t always know how to maintain privacy, and even if they do, they don’t necessarily know when to maintain it. There are some family secrets that shouldn’t be kept secret. Sometimes families try to maintain privacy because certain family members abuse other family members, and don’t want to get in trouble for it. Abused children ought to be able to speak to adults who will help them, but they may not know whether and when they’re being abused, and even if they do know, they may think they deserve to be abused, they may feel a kind of family loyalty and love that stops them from getting the abuser in trouble, or they may not be confident that talking about it will stop the abuse; they may think that could make it worse.
It’s said that everything’s relative – that what is abuse to one person may be simple strictness to another: “spare the rod and spoil the child.” I submit that the rod needs to be spared. Physical abuse has been around for a long time, but we
should know better now; there’s been a lot of learning about what happens to children who grow up abused, and I think it’s time to use words, not rods, to raise children.
But back to the issue of privacy. What if it becomes quite apparent that a child is being abused? What is the responsibility of people who become aware of the abuse? I sometimes compare this sort of situation to that of the nation that becomes aware that the government of another nation is oppressing its people. It brings up some similar questions: do we have the right to tell other people what and what not to do? If so, what power do we have, and how should we use it? Are we in a moral position to judge others?
I’ve answered those questions for myself: in some instances, we do have not only the right, but the responsibility to tell other people what and what not to do. We have a responsibility to do what we can to oppose and prevent genocide and other forms of oppression throughout the world. And though families should be free to choose their life styles, religions, homes, etc., abuse is an issue for all of us. Inaction on this issue is complicity.

Similar Posts

  • 557. Learning to Share

    We teachers and parents do our best to get children to know how to share. Sharing is generally considered a good thing to do. According to Piaget, children start out egocentric. Piaget didn’t make a value judgment about that; he didn’t describe that egocentrism as a form of original sin. But he did observe children…

  • 63. Wait Time

    When you ask a child a question, and you don’t seem to be getting an answer, it’s seems natural to deduce that the child doesn’t know the answer. Rather than prolong the agony, you quickly ask someone else, provide the answer yourself, or change the subject. Part of that reaction may be concern about the…

  • 251. A Quiet Welcome

    As I write this article, spring is very tentatively poking its head through a hard winter. I know it’s superstitious of me, but I try not to welcome it too much, even though I feel like really letting go. I picture spring as a shy child, curious about a new situation, and yet quite ready…

  • 315. Class Placement

    Teachers and administrators usually have a balancing act to do as the school year comes to an end – to place children in the classes they’ll be in come September. There are many factors that go into the process. Parents’ and children’s happiness is one of the factors, but there are usually people who are…