136. A Male Teacher

When people meet me, and find out that I work with young children, they are usually impressed. “Good,” they say. “Young children need the influence of a man.” I’m always a little annoyed by that reaction; I’ve worked hard to become good at teaching young children – I’m still working hard at it – but the reaction people often give refers to a trait over which I had no control. I was born male, and though I think it’s a fine gender (one of the two best, I think), I take no credit for it. It’s something that just happened.
The reaction can mean different things, depending on the source. Some people may mean the opposite of what they say: “Isn’t it a little weird for a man to be teaching young children? What’s wrong with you?” Once, in a job interview, a prospective employer seemed to be uninterested in my experience, philosophy, or education. He asked me whether I was interested in football. I had told him I prefer second grade, and he was obviously trying to find out whether I was a “real man.” I’m not interested in football, and I didn’t get the job.
Some people who applaud maleness seem to be implying that men will somehow do a better job with children than women will. I strongly disagree; there are many variables involved in good teaching, but gender is irrelevant. It’s important to listen to children, to know what language can do, to understand the various aspects of the curriculum…it’s impossible to ennumerate the qualities good teachers need. But a Y chromosome is not one of them. Teachers of young children in this country tend to be women, and I do believe that that tendency indicates a problem, just as the maleness of presidents indicates a problem. There ought to be a balance, and there isn’t one. There’s nothing about the task of helping children deal with life on earth that makes women automatically better candidates. If that’s what people mean when they tell me it’s good to see a man teaching young children, I guess I’ll have to agree.
But the teacher’s gender has nothing to do with the quality of the teacher. If you think it’s good to see a man working with young children, ask yourself whether it’s good to see a woman working with young children. It really is just as good. It’s more common, true, but it’s just as good.

Similar Posts

  • 68. “Good with Kids”

    Sometimes a person is said to be “good with kids.” I think the phrase implies some special talent or insight. A friend suggested that I write an article examining what makes people “good with kids,” and I searched my soul for “the” answer. I thought about my childhood, and tried to remember whether there were…

  • 38. The Printed Word

    There’s something about the printed word that impresses people. When something is written well, and people read it, it’s a little harder to disagree with it than when it is spoken well. When a person speaks, you can watch facial expressions and body language. You can listen to the tone of voice. All your senses…

  • 219. Too Hard?

    I work with Paul Oh, a teacher who believes, among other things, in children’s ability to solve math problems. One day, he asked children to try to find ways to form certain shapes using Tangrams, an ancient Chinese puzzle. The children worked in pairs, with adult support. Some quickly became frustrated, and the frustration built,…

  • 160. Liberal Arts

    This country is full of liberal arts colleges, and elementary and secondary school teachers work hard to prepare students for these colleges. They try to encourage and enhance children’s natural curiosity and enthusiasm about science, mathematics, literature, geography, history, language, etc. If teachers succeeded at all they tried to do, we’d all be Renaissance people,…