539. Sex Role Stereotyping

As an elementary school teacher, I have always worked against sex role stereotyping. I grew up male, and for much of my life, most of my friends had grown up female. We all felt as if we’d been encouraged – sometimes forced – to fit stereotypes that didn’t feel right to us. I wanted to make sure boys grew up gentle and sensitive and girls grew up assertive and strong. Not that boys should become wimps or girls should become tyrants, but I thought society was set up in a way that pushed children into certain traditional roles, and I felt that one of my main missions as a teacher was to help children learn how to push back. So I did all I could to help children resist the stereotypes society was feeding them.
Lots of teachers were and are working to combat sex-role stereotyping. The textbooks that used to be used in schools (and still are, in some schools) were full of stereotypes. The elementary curriculum was full of sexism. The history taught was the history of men. Teachers (including me) really had to work on themselves to weed the sexism out of their language and policies. Despite a great deal of progress that’s been made, there’s still a long way to go.
As many people challenged the status quo, there were people arguing that traditional sex-roles have biological roots – that boys, destined to become men, are naturally aggressive – natural-born hunters. And that girls, destined to become women, are more domestic. I have spent lots of time arguing with people who have thought that way. I don’t think I’ve changed many minds, although two successes stick out in my mind – one in which I convinced a conservative female teacher that I shouldn’t be paid more than she was just because I was male, and another in which I told a conservative father that his daughter had to learn math. Neither adversary clung to sexist thinking in the face of other thinking that was more important to them.
As is true in the struggle for racial equality and many other struggles, people who want to eliminate sexism from schools and society have to keep at it. There are notable successes, and it’s good to celebrate the successes, but sexist thinking has been around for a long time, and eliminating it is going to take a long time. I’ve heard teachers imply that sexism in the curriculum is an old issue – that we dealt with it twenty-five years ago, and don’t need to think about it now. It’s still around, though. Some of it is subtle, some not so subtle. So there’s more work to do.

Similar Posts

  • 612. Censorship

    We aren’t supposed to teach people younger than us to be us. Not that we could, anyway, but it would be good to be aware both that we can’t and that we shouldn’t try to. We can let them know what’s important to us, and hope that whatever is becomes important to them, too, but…

  • 317. Reflections

    There’s an issue you’ve probably had to deal with, or you probably will. What if your child makes you look bad? What if people in your community, some of whom have come to like and respect you, see your child looking, sounding, or behaving in ways that don’t represent your view of how people should…

  • 590. Gratification

    Adults often try to teach children about the glory of delayed gratification. “If you save your money,” we say, “you’ll have it when you really need it. Why get a bunch of stickers or candies now when you could save your money and get something better later?” When we ask children such questions, we want…

  • 203. Abstract and Concrete

    Piaget worked hard to learn about children’s learning, and though I try to avoid worshipping people, Piaget is high up there on my list. But today I found myself taking another look at a dichotomy he’d analyzed. I’d read The Origin of Intelligence in Children, and Play, Dreams, and Imitation in Childhood. I’d considered Piaget’s…