486. All Together, Now!

Several of my friends are experts at getting groups of people to sing together, either in harmony or in spirited unison. I respect the kind of talent needed to lead groups that way. I’ve always enjoyed singing in choruses and sing-alongs, and I think group singing is a powerful way to build community. I’m telling you this to provide a little context for what I’m about to say:
I don’t think everyone should be required to sing along, or to participate in group recitations. I’ve enjoyed much of what’s gone on in some of the religious services I’ve attended, but I particularly dislike times when everyone is expected to say the same words at the same time. People have the right to their individuality, and I feel very uncomfortable when I’m part of a large group that is reciting a bunch of words. It just doesn’t feel right.
The recitations to which I refer tend to be chanted in a dismal monotone. Some of them may be well-written, but I don’t feel like uttering someone else’s words just because everyone around me is uttering them. I suspect that many of the people around me feel uncomfortable about it, too. They don’t smile as they recite, even if they’re saying words that would ordinarily be said with a smile. No matter how joyful the actual content of the recited passage may be, it doesn’t sound joyful to me. It sounds spooky. I imagine a group of zombies headed toward some shrine. And I don’t join in.
I’ve never led my class in the pledge of allegiance. I don’t think I ever would have, even if I had been required to. Luckily, it never became an issue. I don’t think it’s a very good pledge, and I don’t think children understand it, anyway. But neither of those observations is my main reason for refusing to lead it. I feel as if it’s dehumanizing to get everyone to say words written by someone else. Even if I wrote my own pledge, I wouldn’t feel right about requiring other people to chant it. I believe that when people intend to communicate important thoughts, they ought to use their own words.
When I used to say good morning to the children I taught, I didn’t say, “GOOD MORNING, CLASS!” Nor did I expect the class to chant, in unison, “GOOD MORNING, MR. BLUE!” I spoke to individual children as they entered the classroom. A class of twenty has twenty unique children in it, and whatever words each one chooses to utter ought to express what that child wants to express.
Many of the songs I like have choruses that contain important messages. And I like the way Pete Seeger and many other musicians I admire build community by encouraging people to sing together. But if some people don’t want to sing along, that’s okay with me.

Similar Posts

  • 413. Success

    I like to think that my articles give people new perspectives. Whether or not every article I write really does that, it makes me feel good if I think I’ve written something original, perceptive, and/or inspirational. If I write something that doesn’t seem to qualify, I delete it, or maybe file it, to be revised…

  • 28. Homework

    Homework is many issues. Years ago, treating it as one issue, I opposed it. I didn’t give homework, and I responded to parents who wanted it by suggesting things they could do at home. I thought of many reasons parents might have wanted their children to have homework – none of them good reasons. When…

  • 328. A Letter to Pat

    The Pat I’m writing to is a fictional character – a composite of all the people who, for one reason or another, didn’t think I was doing a very good job teaching. Pat may have been a parent, a teacher, an administrator, or a child. There were more people who thought that way in 1969,…

  • 392. Jeremy

    A boy named Jeremy, like most people, likes to do what he does well. What he does well is converse and move around. And he does both really well. You should see him on the soccer field. Or have a conversation with him. As long as Jeremy is doing what he does well, he’s happy…