184. Cooperative Games

My friend Mara Sapon-Shevin does workshops around the world on inclusion and cooperation. She tells participants about the game “musical chairs,” which, in its traditional form, is competitive, and results in more and more exclusion. In a variation on this game, described by Mara, one chair is removed each time the music stops, but no people are removed. Everyone has to figure out a way to fit all the people on the remaining chairs.
That’s more like it. We’re all going to have to figure out a way to live together on this planet, or we’re in big trouble. When the music stops, as it often does, we’ve got to figure out a way to make room for each other. If each person’s goal is just to make sure she/he has a place, eventually there will be many more have-nots than haves everywhere. It could easily be argued that such is already the case in most places.
I’ve written a few articles that have referred to competitive games. Those games really are part of life as it’s been so far. Professional sports, Olympic sports, and the games organized by the neighborhood kids usually create lots of losers. They create winners, too, and to some degree, they’re fun to play and fun to watch. I know many kind, gentle people who are nevertheless into the thrill of victory (though not too many are crazy about the agony of defeat).
I don’t think we’re going to quickly move to cooperative games. Competition is too much a part of who we humans are, and perhaps especially who we Americans are. For a long time, I thought I wasn’t competitive, but I was. I just wasn’t a winner. Since I lost a lot, I thought I’d successfully rejected competition. But a friend made me realize that losing is still part of competition; if I’d completely rejected competition, I would be neither a winner nor a loser.
A long time ago, a child I knew said to me, “It’s not whether you win or lose that counts. It’s whether you win.” It often seems that way. We compete all the time against life’s tendency to get in our way. We push ourselves to do more than we can, and we sometimes end up winning. When we do, it’s a good feeling. But I think there are enough challenges in just plain old living. I don’t think we need to emphasize competition against each other as much as we do. We can get where we’re going without stepping on each other.

Similar Posts

  • 165. Death

    Of all the things I don’t know about, death is king. I’ve never died, and the people closest to me haven’t died, either. I’ve known people who have died, but of course, I immediately lost my ability to communicate with them, so knowing them didn’t bring me much closer to understanding death. And I’ve read…

  • 218. Heroes

    We like to have heroes. When I was in elementary school, George Washington was one of the great people we were supposed to admire. As far as I can remember, one of the most important things he did was confess to a minor misdeed that didn’t seem so bad to me. I never chopped down…

  • 480. Naomi

    After reading what I wrote about Jimmy, the child who can’t do what the other children can, a friend suggested that I write about Naomi – the child who is quite skilled at basketball, and would like to play “real” basketball with other children who are also skilled. She could play with children who are…

  • 219. Too Hard?

    I work with Paul Oh, a teacher who believes, among other things, in children’s ability to solve math problems. One day, he asked children to try to find ways to form certain shapes using Tangrams, an ancient Chinese puzzle. The children worked in pairs, with adult support. Some quickly became frustrated, and the frustration built,…