136. A Male Teacher

When people meet me, and find out that I work with young children, they are usually impressed. “Good,” they say. “Young children need the influence of a man.” I’m always a little annoyed by that reaction; I’ve worked hard to become good at teaching young children – I’m still working hard at it – but the reaction people often give refers to a trait over which I had no control. I was born male, and though I think it’s a fine gender (one of the two best, I think), I take no credit for it. It’s something that just happened.
The reaction can mean different things, depending on the source. Some people may mean the opposite of what they say: “Isn’t it a little weird for a man to be teaching young children? What’s wrong with you?” Once, in a job interview, a prospective employer seemed to be uninterested in my experience, philosophy, or education. He asked me whether I was interested in football. I had told him I prefer second grade, and he was obviously trying to find out whether I was a “real man.” I’m not interested in football, and I didn’t get the job.
Some people who applaud maleness seem to be implying that men will somehow do a better job with children than women will. I strongly disagree; there are many variables involved in good teaching, but gender is irrelevant. It’s important to listen to children, to know what language can do, to understand the various aspects of the curriculum…it’s impossible to ennumerate the qualities good teachers need. But a Y chromosome is not one of them. Teachers of young children in this country tend to be women, and I do believe that that tendency indicates a problem, just as the maleness of presidents indicates a problem. There ought to be a balance, and there isn’t one. There’s nothing about the task of helping children deal with life on earth that makes women automatically better candidates. If that’s what people mean when they tell me it’s good to see a man teaching young children, I guess I’ll have to agree.
But the teacher’s gender has nothing to do with the quality of the teacher. If you think it’s good to see a man working with young children, ask yourself whether it’s good to see a woman working with young children. It really is just as good. It’s more common, true, but it’s just as good.

Similar Posts

  • 603. Group Goals

    If a teacher is lucky and skillful, sometimes a class can be a community of learners, all working together. Everyone in the class is motivated to learn what the teacher has planned to teach. They may have different reasons for being motivated: some may be sincerely interested in what is to be learned; some may…

  • 23. Feelings

    Most teachers, especially primary teachers, spend time teaching children about feelings. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this. But, in a larger sense, (Thank you, Abe Lincoln, for finding the right words) who are we to teach children about feelings? They haven’t had as much time to unlearn the important part…

  • 178. Substitutes

    On some days, your child walks into the classroom and sees an unfamiliar adult face. The teacher isn’t there, and some other adult is there instead. For some children, once in a while, this is a treat. Either a day without the teacher is not such a bad idea, or this particular substitute is fun…

  • 12. Religion

    Even more than we get political views as we grow up, we get religion. We don’t worry that we will burn eternally if we like a candidate our parents don’t, but we’re taught at a very early age whether to believe in a deity, and if so, which one to believe in, how to worship,…

  • 240. Regression

    Most of us usually want our children to grow. We realize that if they keep doing it, eventually they won’t technically be our children any more – our sons and daughters, yes, but not our children. There’s different degrees of sadness about that, but there’s often a lot of joy there, too. I love spending…