110. “Bad Teachers”

I’m not as ready to label someone a “bad teacher” as I used to be. I never labelled anyone a “bad child,” and I’ve recently expanded that policy to include most teachers. I don’t think I have lowered my standards; I think I’ve decided that teachers, like children, want to do the best they can, and even if their best isn’t on a par with other teachers’ best, the comparison isn’t so important.
Maybe it’s because I’m retired, and the competetive mentality is gone. Maybe it’s because the retirement system has superannuated me, and with superannuation comes wisdom. But for whatever reason, I’m able to more clearly see the efforts teachers make, and not fault them as much for things I used to consider their faults.
For example, a teacher I heard yesterday said, “Boys and girls, would you please line up here?” Around 1972, I decided never to call my class “boys and girls.” I thought the phrase, though commonplace and accurate, highlighted a difference that was irrelevant to the situation, and made the difference more important than it needed to be. No teachers I’ve known have ever addressed their classes as “blacks and whites,” or “Jews and gentiles.” Perhaps I was making much ado about nothing, but I don’t think so.
But that’s not the point. The teacher who addressed her class as “boys and girls” may listen well to any child who has a concern. She may be able to explain things in ways that work for children who usually get confused by teachers. There are so many things to think about in becoming a teacher (I almost wrote “being a teacher,” but I don’t think it’s ever a fait accompli) that examining the implications of “boys and girls” (and agreeing with me after the examination) may not have a high priority.
I write articles, and hope that teachers will read them. I talk with teachers and express my opinions on issues that come up. As a volunteer, I try to model what I consider good teaching. But I no longer sit in judgment of other teachers as much as I used to. And you, vegetarians and meat-eaters of Wellesley, I hope you are doing it less. Most teachers are trying to be good at what they do.

Similar Posts

  • 70. Neatness

    Some children are just naturally neat. They don’t seem to have to put any effort into it. They’re very lucky. They end up with lots of free time while others are busy straightening up their desks, rooms, or whatever. And they get lots of appreciation; neatness is a quality that pleases adults more reliably than…

  • 510. Little

    I remember the first time a very young child came to me and started a story with “Mr. Blue, when I was little…” I did manage to keep myself from laughing out loud, but I thoroughly enjoyed hearing that opening line. There I was, over twenty years old, hearing a six year old child reminisce…

  • 121. Talking

    There’s such excitement when a child first utters a word. It’s the beginning of a new level of communication. We start to know so much more about the person than we could ever learn through grunts, cries, and all those other pre-verbal sounds. The moment is written down in a baby book, maybe, or at…